Bloom observes that the reader discovers the subject of the poem is a train by "seeing and hearing it, instead of being told directly". answer would always be What was the poet Emily Dickinson referring to the same. Bloom indicates the poem is one of the very few in which Dickinson examined a current technology, and points out that its theme is the effect such a technology may have on the landscape and on people and animals. Harold Bloom points out that the poem is a riddle (like Dickinson's "A Route of Evanescence" and "A narrow Fellow in the Grass"), and that the poet enjoyed sending children, especially her Norcross cousins, such poems, taking delight in observing her audience discovering the poem's subject. The "horrid - hooting stanza" is the train's whistle but, at the same time, as Vendler believes, a self-criticism Dickinson makes of herself as a "bad poet". The exact animal employed as a metaphor for the railroad initially proves a puzzle, but at poem's end it is decidedly a horse which neighs and stops (like the Christmas Star) at a "stable door". The 'peering into shanties' metaphor is thought "snobbish". Children love this poem, but critics find it "coy" and "lightweight". Ĭriticism of the poem is varied, Vendler observes. The station was situated not far from the Dickinson Homestead on Main Street, and the reclusive Dickinson attended its opening, watching alone from the woods. Helen Vendler points out that the railroad (as a symbol of progress) was not an uncommon subject for literature in 19th century America, and indicates Dickinson's father (a lawyer) was instrumental in bringing the railroad to their hometown of Amherst, Massachusetts. The Amherst railroad station, built in 1853 In this poem Dickinson describes how she likes to watch trains as they journey along, lick(ing) the valleys up as they go by.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |